Everything about Indo-parthian totally explained
The
Indo-Parthian Kingdom was established during the
1st century by
Gondophares, and at its greatest extent extended into areas that are in present-day
Afghanistan,
Pakistan and Northern
India.
For most of its history, the capital of the kingdom was at
Taxila (in present-day Pakistan), but during the last few years of its existence the capital was at
Kabul (present-day Afghanistan).
Secession from Parthia
Around
20 CE,
Gondophares, a vassal of the Parthian Arsacids, declared his independence from the Parthian empire and established the Indo-Parthian kingdom in the conquered territories.
The kingdom barely lasted one century. It started to fragment under Gondophares' successor Abdagases. The northern Indian part of the kingdom was retaken by the
Kushans around
75.
After that point the kingdom was essentially restricted to Afghanistan. The last king
Pacores (
100 -
135) only ruled
Sakastan and Turan.
Indo-Parthian territories
The Parthians ended up controlling extensive territories in Northern India, after fighting many local rulers such as the
Kushan Empire ruler
Kujula Kadphises, in the
Gandhara region. Gondophares was the ruler of areas comprising
Arachosia,
Seistan,
Sindh,
Gandhara, and the
Kabul valley, but it doesn't seem he held territory east beyond the
Punjab.
The city of
Taxila is thought to have been the capital of the Indo-Parthians. Large strata were excavated by Sir
John Marshall with a quantity of Parthian-style artifacts. The nearby Hellenistic temple of Jandial is usually interpreted as a Zoroastrian
fire temple from the period of the Indo-Parthians.
Some ancient writing describe the presence of the Parthians in the area, such as the story of Saint
Thomas the Apostle, who was recruited as a carpenter to serve at the court of king "Gudnaphar" (thought to be Gondophares) in India. The
Acts of Thomas describes in chapter 17 Thomas' visit to king
Gondophares in northern India; chapters 2 and 3 depict him as embarking on a sea voyage to India, thus connecting Thomas to the west coast of India.
The Greek philosopher
Apollonius of Tyana is related by
Philostratus in
Life of Apollonius Tyana to have visited India, and specifically the city of
Taxila around
46 CE. He describes constructions of the Greek type,
probably referring to
Sirkap, and explains that the
Indo-Parthian king of Taxila, named
Phraotes, received a Greek education at the court of his farther and spoke Greek fluently:
» "Tell me, O King, how you acquired such a command of the Greek tongue, and whence you derived all your philosophical attainments in this place?"
[...]-"My father, after a Greek education, brought me to the sages at an age somewhat too early perhaps, for I was only twelve at the time, but they brought me up like their own son; for any that they admit knowing the Greek tongue they're especially fond of, because they consider that in virtue of the similarity of his disposition he already belongs to themselves."
The
Periplus of the Erythraean Sea is a surviving 1st century guide to the routes commonly being used for navigating the Arabian Sea. It describes the presence of Parthian kings fighting with each other in the area of Sindh, a region traditionally known at that time as "Scythia" due to the previous rule of the Indo-Scythians there:
» "This river (
Indus) has seven mouths, very shallow and marshy, so that they're not navigable, except the one in the middle; at which by the shore, is the market-town, Barbaricum. Before it there lies a small island, and inland behind it's the metropolis of Scythia, Minnagara; it's subject to Parthian princes who are constantly driving each other out." Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, Chap 38
An inscription from Takht-i-Bahi near
Hada bears two dates, one in the regnal year 26 of the Maharaja Guduvhara (again thought to be Gondophares), and the year 103 of an unknown era.
Indo-Parthians in Gandhara
The Indo-Parthians seemingly occupied the area of
Gandhara between around 20 CE, when Gondophares took over from the
Indo-Scythians, to around 60 CE, when Kujula Kadphises established Kushan rule there.
Indo-Parthians and Indian religions
To the contrary of the Indo-Greeks or Indo-Scythians, there are no explicit records of Indo-Parthian rulers supporting Buddhism or Hinduism, such as religious dedications, inscriptions, or even legendary accounts. Also, although Indo-Parthian coins generally closely follow Greek numismatics, they never display the Buddhist
triratna symbol (apart from the later
Sases), nor do they ever use depictions of the elephant or the bull, possible religious symbols which were profusely used by their predecessors.
Representation of Indo-Parthian devotees
On their coins and in the art of Gandhara, Indo-Parthians are depicted with short crossover
jackets and large baggy trousers, possibly supplemented by
chap-like over-trousers. Their jackets are adorned with rows of decorative rings or medals. Their hair is usually bushy and contained with a headband, a practise largely adopted by the Parthians from the 1st century CE.
Individual Indo-Parthians are sometimes shown as actors in Buddhist devotional scenes. It is usually considered that most of the excavations that were done at
Sirkap near
Taxila by
John Marshall relate to Indo-Parthian layers, although more recent scholarship sometimes relates them to the
Indo-Greeks instead. These archaeological researches provided a quantity of Hellenistic artifacts combined with elements of Buddhist worship (
stupas). Some other temples, such as nearby Jandial may have been used as a Zoroastrian
fire temple.
Buddhist sculptures
The statues found at Sirkap in the late Scythian to Parthian level (level 2, 1-60 CE) suggest an already developed state of Gandharan art at the time or even before Parthian rule. A multiplicity of statues, ranging from Hellenistic gods, to various Gandharan lay devotees, are combined with what are thought as some of the early representations of the Buddha and Bodhisattvas. Today, it's still unclear when the
Greco-Buddhist art of
Gandhara exactly emerged, but the findings in Sirkap do indicate that this art was already highly developed before the advent of the
Kushans.
Stone palettes
Numerous
stone palettes found in Gandhara are considered as good representatives of Indo-Parthian art. These palettes combine Greek and Persian influences, together with a frontality in representations which is considered as characteristic of Parthian art. Such palettes have only been found in archaeological layers corresponding to Indo-Greek, Indo-Scythian and Indo-Parthian rule, and are essentially unknown the preceding
Mauryan layers or the succeeding
Kushan layers.
Very often these palettes represent people in Greek dress in mythological scenes, but a few of them represent people in Parthian dress (head-bands over bushy hair, crossed-over jacket on a bare chest, jewelry, belt, baggy trousers). A palette from the
Naprstek Museum in
Prague shows an Indo-Parthian king seated crossed-legged on a large sofa, surrounded by two attendants also in Parthian dress. They are shown drinking and serving wine.
Image:IndoParthianHunting.JPG|Indo-Parthian man hunting.
Image:IndoParthianReveling.JPG|Indo-Parthian revelers.
Image:IndoParthianCouple.JPG|Indo-Parthian couple.
Image:FireAltarWorship.JPG|Devotees at a fire altar, possibly Zoroastrian.
Silk Road transmission of Buddhism
Some pocket of Parthian rule remained in the East, even after the takeover by the
Sassanids in
226. From the 2nd century several Central-Asian Buddhist missionaries became in the Chinese capital cities of
Loyang and sometimes
Nanjing, where they particularly distinguished themselves by their translation work. The first known translators of Buddhist texts into Chinese are actually Parthian missionaries, distinguished in Chinese by their Parthian surname "An", for "Anshi", "country of the
Arsacids".
An Shih Kao, was a Parthian prince, who made the first known translations of Hinayana Buddhist texts into Chinese (148-170).
An Hsuan, was a Parthian merchant who became a monk in China 181
Tan-ti (c.254), a Parthian monk.
An Fachiin (281-306), a monk of Parthian origins.
South Indian legacy?
There are some claims based on historical, anthropological, and linguistic evidence indicating that the Southern Indian kingdom of the Pallavas was originally founded by the Parthians, either from Iran or from the territories of the Indo-Parthians in north-werstern India, also called Pahlavas in Indian litterature. These Pahlavas of Indo-Iranian descent would have migrated Southward and first settled in Krishna river valley of present day coastal Andhra Pradesh. This region is called Palnadu or Pallavanadu even today. Pallavas later extended their sway up to Northern Tamil region and established a flourishing empire.
Main Indo-Parthian rulers
Gondophares I (c. 20-50) Coin
Abdagases I (c. 50-65) Coin
Satavastres (c. 60) Coin
Sarpedones (c.70) Coin
Orthagnes (c. 70) Coin
Ubouzanes (c. 77) Coin
Sases or Gondophares II, (c. 85) Coin
Abdagases II (c. 90) Coin
Pacores (c. 100) CoinFurther Information
Get more info on 'Indo-parthian'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://indo-parthian_kingdom.totallyexplained.com">Indo-Parthian Kingdom Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
